![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Chaotic Neutral
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cherry Hill NJ
Moto: GV1200 Madura, Hawk gt
Posts: 13,992
|
![]()
plus for some unimaginable reason suzy's 750s outweigh some liters. whats the point then?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
yellow don't corner well
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kansas City, KS
Moto: 06 ZX10R
Posts: 1,243
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Chaotic Neutral
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cherry Hill NJ
Moto: GV1200 Madura, Hawk gt
Posts: 13,992
|
![]()
if it weighs more the handling is gonna suffer, yes?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
yellow don't corner well
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kansas City, KS
Moto: 06 ZX10R
Posts: 1,243
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Elitist
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Moto: Gix 750
Posts: 11,351
|
![]()
Liter bikes have more reciprocating mass, which works against you when the revs are high. Also, not everyone wants liter-bike insurance.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,156
|
![]() Quote:
Kawi used to sell a 750 but they were no where near competitive with the GSXR's. I love the 750 power plant and if any of the manufacturers came out with a 800cc GP replica, I'd drool all over one. For me I don't need a liter bike. I rode a new GSXR1000 and it wasn't for me. The 750 has enough low end grunt and mid range to keep me happy. I dont need to go 180+mph. The 600's on the other hand don't have enough low end torque for how I like to ride. Now the new ZX-6R is supposed to have increased low end torque so that may solve my problem with that. My logic was this, sure the 750 was $1000 more than a 600 but to get that extra 30hp I would have had to spend well over a grand to get that kind of extra power and the 750 is pretty damn close in weight to the 600, so it's just like buying a 600 with a factory engine upgrade. Sure I could have spent an additional $1000 to jump up the the liter bike but like mentioned above, they're not my style of bike. I'd be happy if all the manufacturers started producing 750s again, especially Yamaha, but I doubt it will ever happen. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
DefenderOfTheBuelliverse
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Parts Unknown
Moto: Buell XB12R
Posts: 18,585
|
![]()
I'll always have a place in my heart for the 3/4 liter GSXR.
__________________
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
White Trash Hero
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NW Arkansas
Moto: Buell 1125R Porco Rosso Edition
Posts: 4,895
|
![]()
Suzuki have kept the 750 in the lineup cause it is still cost efficient to produce. Used to they based the 600cc GSXR on the 750, sharing design and production budget. Now they base the 750 on the 600 but still have the same chassis and ancillary parts (wheels, bodywork, brakes, controls, frames).
The GSXR 750 also has a cult following in Europe where they sell strong. Personally I loved the ZX7 and the GSXR750. Even had a crush on the YZF750, although I never felt the R7. My ZX6/636 has great torque and with my slightly larger rear sprocket feels very 750 ish. I just don't have to worry about flipping it over like I would a liter bike...
__________________
![]() Arkriders.com To be the best you must first be willing to risk the worst! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Elitist
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Moto: Gix 750
Posts: 11,351
|
![]() Quote:
Another problem with 600's is that the rpm's are higher on the freeway, which gets old over long distances. 750 is the best of both worlds, they are better commuters than 600's, and better handlers than most 1000's. Last edited by Homeslice; 03-13-2009 at 11:13 AM.. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,156
|
![]()
Agreed that's why I chose the 750 for my last bike.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|