Quote:
Originally Posted by Papa_Complex
Well off the top of my head, I would say that it's wrong because it creates a situation in which people whose information is abused have no recourse, as the people who have requested it act as an information buffer between the source, and the destination.
A crime? No. Morally repugnant? Yes.
|
They have recourse, hell they could of stopped it from ever happening. However, they elected the wrong people and a law that would of prevented this from happening failed to pass. Change the law, get this taken down.
There is a lot of things the media publishes that isn't exactly moral, but that doesn't mean they can't publish it or wrong to do it.