![]() |
2001 Suzuki TL1000R vs. 2002 Honda CBR 954RR... another biased comparison.
I'm going to try to set this up like the Buell/Honda comparo I did a while ago...
Presence - Winner - TLR Being a streetfighter guy, I think both of these bikes could use a good amount of Dremeling and some rattle can flat black paint... however, I can honestly say that the CBR probably just looks better. It's got harder lines and looks faster than the TLR. Now, there's nothing that OSP likes more than a chick with a nice fat ass... really, I do. The thing is, I am not too keen on a bike with a fat ass... and the TLR's rockin' some Oprah sized booty. Too much. I will say this for the TLR though... the exhaust looks hot from the rear. Now, part of presence is obviously sound. No comparison. The CBR sounds really fast, but the TLR sounds really PISSED OFF. The Yosh pipes really set it off and let that V-twin sing... Such a glorious tune it is. Simply from pure sound alone the TLR wins with overall presence. Ergonomics - Winner - TLR I was very surprised by the CBR in terms of comfort. Riding from Colorado Springs into NM, then over to Deal's Gap within 5 days certainly didn't sound like a good idea on that bike, but I'll be damned if it was pretty comfortable. On the other hand the TLR just seems to fit me better. The seat to bar distance feels longer and the pegs don't feel so close to the seat. Overall, I just feel more stretched out on the TLR. The riding position in general feels more relaxed, but I've only put about 80 miles on it so it's hard to say how it will feel for the long haul. It's worth noting as well that the CBR's seat is like a wrapped up hunk of concrete, but the TLR's is a little more plush. Again though, without putting a ton of miles on it, it's hard to say with any certainty... for now, the TLR is more comfortable. Handling - Winner - TLR Really it's not a fair comparison here. The CBR's fork seal started leaking before I even made it to The Gap, so I never got a true read for how well it should have handled. Combine that with the factory squared rear tire and the CBR was fighting a losing battle. I can say with certain confidence that the CBR would have been a great handling machine in prime condition... it was plenty capable even with it's issues. To be fair, I don't really have enough time on the TLR to really support this, but I think it seems like a much more stable machine in the turns. It turns in quick enough, but just locks into a line like a pitbull on a toddler. When I first got onto the on ramp after acquiring the TLR I turned in and thought to myself, "This will certainly be the machine I first drag knee with." Very confidence inspiring. Drivetrain - Winner - CBR In reality, both the CBR and the TLR have slick shifting gearboxes that just scream high quality... The CBR just seems to shift a little easier, but that could simply be my lack of miles on the TLR. Another difference comes with driveline lash. Both bikes suffer from it, but the TLR seems to handle it a little better. Again though, maybe it's just my inexperience with this bike. In the event that more miles changes any of these thoughts, I'll be sure to update this thread. Engine - Winner - TLR Man, how drastically different these bikes are. When I first rode the TLR, it felt really, really SLOW... As much as it pains me to admit it, I was growing fond of the top end rush that the I4 provides. That being said, 10 minutes later I was over that shit and had a rock hard erection for the V-Twin. I feel pretty confident that if I put the TLR on a diet and do a little tweaking, I won't miss the 15HP deficit the Honda creates. That being said, the damn TLR just sings and pulls like someone's sticking red hot razor blades up it's tailpipe. Me likey. Overall - Winner - TLR Damn it feels good to be back on a V-twin. The torque, the wicked vibrations, the SOUND... All motorcycles should be V-twins... or at least all motorcycle riders should at least experience a V-twin at some point in time. Best street machines ever conceived. The TLR seems to fit me better in just about every way over the CBR... physically and more importantly, emotionally. This may be a motorcycle that I have to keep forever. |
I love your biased comparo's. I also love Vtwins...so...:idk: But I have a hard time believing the CBR is out handled by the TLR. But...I've never ridden a CBR.
VTWIN FTMFW! |
Quote:
|
congrats! TLR's are awesome!!!
|
I'm really glad that you like it buddy! I wish you could have given the SV1000 a try tho'. I've ridden both and I really liked the more "standard" feel of the SV,I've never been a big fan of the radial shock.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Dude... seroiusly... I don't even have to read the comparo... v-twins will always win!!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I had mt TLR for 2+ years...its was a great bike!! A bit heavy but comfortable like no other bike I have ever owned.
|
Quote:
gd thing u got a i4, cuz would take one hell of a vtwin to produce the power needed to fix your eyes im not a vtwin hater, but im not a blind follower lol |
Quote:
|
And I'd venture to say that people who own the TL's and the twins are opposite of the followers.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
blind follower was just fuckin with gas about that statement, ive internetually known u guys long enough to know u arent tards when it comes to bikes the tlr is badass, id trade my gsxr for one |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
only cuz i got a bike strictly for drag racing now-wouldnt even think of the tlr for pullin double duty that buell u got id trade the gsxr for too, both look gd, black and yellow, black and gold...hmmm daytona 675 se is on that trade list too. osp-u planning on changing anything besides exhaust? |
Quote:
I wouldn't trade my Buell for ANY I4. No way no how. |
Quote:
And I think I'm going to try to sell off the plastics... maybe get some track glass and rig up some easily removable headlight/taillight/signal combo... Flat black with glossy black graphics... Not sure what the theme will be though... Hell I might get all the plastics off and fall in love with it as is... Stainless lines are certainly in the cards... and new fucking tires. Dunslop 208's on it now... Probably SS pads when I get the lines... Maybe rearsets... I dunno... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Truth has been spoken many times in this thread.
though I do belive that my next bike would be a I4 or a triple (750 or 675) as a track slut only. Love the twin for the street. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Its simple... think of all the baddest bikes... from rice to pasta to tea... all v-twins.
|
Quote:
:lol: hey maybe u can trade a guy with black plastics... http://i200.photobucket.com/albums/a...tro/tiller.jpg but then u cant have this sweet bday cake http://i200.photobucket.com/albums/a...thdayCakeC.jpg |
I had a fully moded TLS, although comfy for all day. And I loved this bike. Mt current 929 in stock form whips its ass in every aspect. Roll on 929 will walk away from the twin. Stock suspension is almost better than the ohlins rear and upgraded front end on the TL. I had lighter rims for the tl and it still felt like a sled tipped over and the 929 just flicks back and forth.
I think you have a case of I love my bike. Current ride bone stock 929 previous twin sv650 with cam swap, jetted, exhaust, braided line, upgrade front forks, 636 rear shock. Felt like a POS. Didnt own it a year. Tl1000s bought new in 99 PC2 Full Ti Yosh exhaust OZ rims Forks with .90 springs gold valve and preload built by Pro shop Ohlins rear shock Harris rearsets Braided line EBC pro lite rotors Sharkinz street kit Scott Steering damper Par Mod Reworked wiring harness Custom sprocket covers Carbon screen regeared for mountains and probably a bunch of shit ive forgotten Ran great, loved it to death. Was a great bike for years. stock 929 will out run it , out perform it period. Just not as comfortable. |
isnt the tls alot dif than the tlr? 929 maybe same as 954, idk.
but he did say biased review lol |
what's the difference between the TLS and the TLR? :idk:
and he's said it was a bias comparison... he just likes the V-Twin. he's not saying the TLR out performs the 954... just that he prefers it. |
There not too mush difference in the 2 bikes. The engines will swap out from one to the other. R has a little better FI system. S is the lighter of the 2. R came with heavier springs in the front and a hydrolic clutch. Most switch the clutch for the S. S and R both have alot of the same internal pieces. Same clutch although earilier S did have a slightly different clutch. Clutch is a first style slipper type clutch. Works best with a set of barnett springs in it.
Both bikes need help in the FI system, either a yosh box mapping or a PC with a custom map. Rear shocks on both need to be tossed for upgrades. Wheels are bricks. A nice lighter wheel up front makes a world of difference. Wiring is too be desired. The 30 amp starter relay is an issue. It needs to be removed and upgraded or made into a solid device inside the wiring harness. Once done is bullet proof. Removing the entire wiring harness and cutting the factory crimps and soldering the entire thing will greatly improve spark and spark plug life. I could go on for a very very long time along with a few other members on this board that I know where long time owners and heavy modders of the models. All in all between the R and S, it mostly boiled down to who put the more tme into it. |
01 tlr
TL 1000 R 2001 Overall Length: 2 100 mm (82.6 in) Overall Width: 740 mm (29.1 in) Overall Height: 1 120 mm (44.0 in) Seat Height: 825 mm (32.5 in) Wheelbase: 1 395 mm (54.9 in) Ground Clearance: 120 mm (4.7 in) Dry Weight: 197 kg (434 lbs) Engine type: Water-cooled 996 cc 4-stroke 90° V-twin, DOHC, TSCC, 8 valves. 135 hp (99,3 kW)/ 9.500 rpm, 106 Nm/ 7.500 rpm. 99tls Overall Length: 2,065 mm (81.3 in) Overall Width: 715 mm (28.1 in) Overall Height: 1,175 mm (46.3 in) Seat Height: 835 mm (32.9 in) Wheelbase: 1,415 mm (55.7 in) Ground Clearance: 140 mm (5.5 in) Dry Weight: 187 kg (411 lbs) Engine type: Water-cooled 996 cc 4-stroke 90° V-twin, DOHC, TSCC, 8 valves. 125 hp (92 kW)/ 8,500 rpm, 107.4 Nm/ 7,100 rpm. dif frame, dif swingarm, thats just the visible stuff, so looking at this, i would assume they ride like two diff bikes, even tho alotta parts are compatible |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.italiaspeed.com/2006/cars...ici_rr/103.jpg http://z.about.com/d/motorcycles/1/0..._front_3-4.jpg http://members.fortunecity.com/roadr...onda-nr750.jpg :whistle: |
mumm... DESMO... :drool:
|
Quote:
The S actually won a race, the R never did. |
Quote:
This is from last night at a local custom bike shop (ReverCorsa.com).. the video is pretty poor quality (I only had my cell phone with me), so it does NOT do the bike justice at all. Suffice it to say.. I had a private moment in front of a lot of people when that bike was running. :drool::drool: |
OSP, you have a problem with the mainstream. I can understand this considering your personality, but honestly it makes your bike comparisons look like comparing bottle rockets and cruise missles.
when the hell did you buy a tiller? |
Quote:
I traded a guy for it yesterday. Put almost 300 miles on her so far... Totally lovin' it. There are a few things I need to do that will hopefully help me love it more: Set up the suspension! It's way too soft for my fat ass as is... I'm showing like 6 preload marks and I know damn full well I should probably have it totally locked down... I need to find someone who knows what their doing first and foremost... I gotta change the oil... I think maybe some synthetic will slicken up the gearbox a bit. I got pretty spoiled with the silky smoothness of the CBR and syn made the Buell loosen up... It's not bad, just different. I want stainless lines and some good pads stat. The feel of the brakes was much better on the CBR... of course it had stainless lines... I'm pretty sure the calipers are a big gummed up as well. I'm considering changing the gearing a bit... Probably go up two in the back and do the 520 conversion... I hammered it in for an indicated 165 today... the fastest I've ever gone... The thing was rock solid, scary stable... In fact, I decided to hammer it when I looked down and noticed I was already at 110... felt like 80... So giving myself less top speed potential is most certainly a good idea... hmm... maybe I shoudl go down three. |
Quote:
maybe you should go to the track with it. U do know a bike is more stable the faster you go, corrects? |
damn those things are wheelie machines and your gonna GO DOWN?!
also remember for your road trips that's gonna murder your range and fuel economy :2cents: |
Up 2 in the rear is a great gearing for it.
I would recommending sticking with steel sprockets and the 530 for mileage. Be very careful with the oil drain plug, they are very known to strip out. Braided lines will make the brakes ok with a decent set of pads. IIRC set the forks around 5mm showing above the top clamp once you get the suspension set. That was about the most common setting on the TL, I would start adjusting from there. After the weight is set. You will feel the shift instantly and figure out where you like the front end yourself. Tlzone and Tlplanet are you 2 best sources of info. |
Quote:
Not worried about fuel economy... 3/4 of the time I ride mid way through the revs or higher anyway... Plus, it's a 996cc liquid cooled v-twin... Gas mileage was murdered long ago... Not to mention, stopping every 120 miles is not necessarily a bad thing... |
Drewp ran our last group ride with all V-Twins (Buells, RC51, SV's).
He made the comment that it was different riding with I4 groups. Different sweet spots. All torque less top end. I am biased toward v-twins as well. I think part of the draw is that they AREN'T I4's. I4's are really refined and are fantastic machines. V-Twins are not as refined. They are rougher around the edges. I want a bike that is hot, vibrates, smells like gas and burning souls, sounds like you are running a chainsaw through a snare drum, and scares the piss out of you at least once every time you take it out of the barn. There are so many ways that I4's are superior to many V-Twins. There are so many ways that even with that superiority, I will pick a V-Twin over an I4 given the chance. The TLR is on my short list of wanted bikes. Ducati, RC51, Moto Guzzi, Aprilia, are all on the list. http://www.motoguzzi-us.com/Nuovi_mo...fx/zoom/30.jpg Mmmmmmm. Dead Sexy. |
goin down 3t? think u mean goin up....
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I will most certainly stick with steel sprockets for mileage... good idea staying with 530... or maybe go with some of those uber-cool long mileage ones and do the 520... gotta do more research... I've seen lotsa guys, mostly TLS guys, going with Busa calipers... Not sure if that'd be worth it as the TLR already has 6-pots... Again, gotta read more... |
Quote:
|
Busa are more for appearence. Your choice is 6 pot or 4 pot. The 4 pot are the better for overall feel and the 6 pot are for stopping. You have 6 pot already. Put a good set of lines and your set unless you want to mod cosmetic.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
different strokes, u know the rest unless its a racebike, vtwin sportbikes sound the best-second only to a triple |
You go up 2 in the rear I was getting about 17K out of my chain and sprockets (530 DID with steel afam)
Fuel mileage isnt really effected until your romping the gas. Youll see about 100 a tank on/off throttle 120-140ish with the wind at your back HWY. I dont know how much you sport ride. My TL felt really good running the Diablo Strada on the rear with a Diablo up fornt. Got very good mileage, and with the weight of the bike the sport touring tire did well even in the curves. |
Quote:
I sport ride as much as FL's straight, flat roads will allow it... So I try to drag knees through intersections mostly. Diablos came stock on my Buell... I only got 3k out of the rears... Got less than that out of the 2CT's... of course, that's cause I got a nail in the rear... Had about 1k on the Road 2's, but never was in a position to push them at all... I was probably going to run the Road 2's again considering the geography of this area... Although, I've been wanting to do a track day for a long, long time so maybe I'll try the 2ct's again... They were actually wearing really well before I got the nail... and they stuck like glue in the corners... |
OSP you should come up and do the TWFix rally in late May. it's a trip... I know... but it's also a mini rally
|
Quote:
dude. thats pretty stupid. and thats comming from a guy that fucked 2 guard rails this year. |
Quote:
either you come of you dont. slap a twfix sticker on it and i'll be there. |
I say mini because the list only had like 5 regulars...
and yes... last year was sad... never again! I'll do everything possible to attend from now on... next 4 years should be good considering I can't deploy for that long. |
Where is this said "rally"?
|
Stay away from the -1 up front. My speedo was probably more acurate +2 than it was stock. That might have had something to do with running a 180-55 instead of the OEM 190-50 and the speedo is off the front sprocket so going -1 on the front will throw it wayyyy off.
You could go 3 up in the rear and be happier than +2 -1. I tried it once the bike was very unsettled in corners vs RPM. +2 was almost perfect. |
it's not the rally... it's the TWFix Track day... in shitville...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
and go check out the thread I bumped... fucker
|
Quote:
I found it cockholster. |
Quote:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...Ovalpiston.jpg http://www.vsource.org/VFR-RVF_files/Images/nr1.jpg |
Quote:
|
u only posted three exceptions, but not the only three exceptions
the chop just rattled gman brain alil lol i thought the nr sold to the public? |
lots of valves there...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
in very limited numbers @ $50,000 a pop. the chances of average joe myself ever aquiring one are extremely shitty. an f4 on the other hand i could swing by selling some toys and making some painful budget cuts. Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm thinking about it chode smoker. |
Quote:
|
Why are you fucks queering up my thread? Go flirt some place else...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
yeah you clearly said v-twins buddy.
|
Hateeeeeeeeeers.
|
geesh... give a guy a break
|
Are people still fucking up this thread?:twfix:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
if you dont like the tlr tail look into a 03 gixxer 1k tail mod, a lot of guys do it. Just need a bit of welding a 03 gixxer subframe and plastics.
________ Babimac ________ Easy Vape Digital Hands Free Vaporizer |
Quote:
|
tlzone.net they have 954 tail section mods 03 gixxer mods and i think a few others, i dont like most of the guys on that forum but some of them know their stuff.
________ HONDA CB600F HISTORY ________ Latin girl live |
Ya know, the fact that all of the Japanese companies have pretty much all but given on on v-twin sportbikes really pisses me off...
|
Quote:
Hey it's not the factories' fault. They have all presented the public with good V-Twins...we're just not buying them. Why should they keep selling bikes that no one is buying?:idk: |
yep, its like elections. you vote with your dollars
|
well it also has to do with the I4's now compete'n with the Duc's in races... for a while the I4's couldn't compete well with the Duc's...
but the problem is people buy'n a spec sheet... like the new GSXR1000 has 180+hp so it must be the fastest (i have no idea what the new bikes make just making a point) I was talk'n to a couple guys the other day... talk'n about buy'n a new bike. I mentioned I want either a GSXR or CBR600RR 06-09... and they were both quote'n what the 09's were puting out in hp... oh the GSXR is putting out 120hp this year... no way you'll want the 06 with only 110 or so... :lol: yeah cause that extra 20hp is worth the extra 4g's it'll cost me. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:23 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.